Unquestionably that the emblematic hostages military rescue operation, in which Ingrid Betancourt, the three American citizens, among other national army and police members, turn out to be a very hard and irreversible blow for these FARC bloodthirsty criminals as well as XXI century socialism political project, which is inspired in the Bolivarian ideal, which betted a negotiation through humanitarian interchange, by bestowing the status of political beligerent acting force to this delinquent group, who employs the kidnapping as a political weapon to blackmail and to demand a condition set against any peacemaking initiative , in which we have to make a special acknowledgment to the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, whereas he took as his own cause the hostages liberation, particularly Ingrid Betancourt, exerting steady pressure on the Farc and international community.Without digressing with technical details about the rescue operation, as it has been confirmed by the same kidnapped ones, regarding it as impeccable, perfect spectacular even as a miracle among other qualifications, the important fact, from now on is to analyze its consequences or the impact that this novel fact will affect the Colombian internal reality.
Whereas our frail democracies, which are permanently harassed by totalitarian tendency
regimes. It is certain that for the unjustly blooded sister Colombian Republic, for a tiny irrational group, the rescue means a new success in the history of that country, and a lesson that we all must learn, seeing that these movements have abandoned the ideological and political struggle , and turned into a narcoterrorist criminal organization, which has let them to self-finance , as well as they are contributed openly or closely by sympathetic governments, banks and NGO, many of them, who say that they defend the human rights, but not the victims ,but the terrorists.In my very particular opinion, as shown in many articles about terrorism, spread by Internet, I
have never advocated or I will advocate to dialog with criminals as terrorists, because they use it as a strategy to improve their image ,both in an internal or external level, they say they take care of the hostages, by recurring to the “humanitarian interchange “ making believe of their sensibility for the human rights respect , they impersonate the experts in this subject , but they are the first ones who outrage these elementary rights; we have only to mention the vile and coward assassination in “El Valle”of the eleven deputies, they put to blame cynically to the people who really strife for the peacemaking and welfare of their countrymen.
Undoubtedly, that the Bolivarian political project is diminishing its strength, due to the hard blows that has been dealt to his potential armed groups, now very dwindled, who was in charge to face militarily the democratic government of Colombia. The casualties of their supreme leaders: Marulanda, Raúl Reyes, Iván Ríos and the seizure and now in USA prision of important leader e.g. Simon Trinidad and Sonia, the active terrorist demobilization, and now the rescue of these emblematic hostages. For this criminal organization is the worst thing that could have passed on them, and it is better for them that they release the great quantity of hostages without demanding anything in return, which does not spear them to be submitted to just trial for their committed crimes and the sever damage caused to the noble Colombian people, the rest of the region and the international community, by mean of the arms and drugs trafficking, and also by the money laundering , among other illicit acts. It is very recent or premature to analyze or to evaluate what is going to happen from the political viewpoint due to this operation. A question, that I can afford
to ask to myself, is the following one: who will win?, and who will lose? a far-reaching fact, like the one occurred on the July 02, 2008. My first perception in view of the events is that the great winner is the “peace, liberty and the democracy” as a matter of fact in this particular case of Colombia, the president Alvaro Uribe who was at the height of a statesman and a political-military strategist , characterized by his plainness and humbleness. The big loser will be, beside the FARC, all the governments and political leaders who opposed and spoiled the Colombian government strife politics against the narcoterrorism.
As to the region, the positions are split, this fact also extends internally to Columbian, but it does not reach more than 10 % of the ones who oppose this succeeded and brave decision from the Columbian President, among them ironically Ingrid Betancourt’s mother, Mrs. Yolanda Pulecio, who acts under the advise and guard of Mrs. Piedad Cordova, with whom certainly were dedicated to the political tourism at the expense of hostages' pains and sufferings. Tourism supported by resource of obscure sources.In certain means, terrorism spokesmen, as well as people who sympathizes with it, who try to get the worldwide public opinion confused by asserting that that rescue did not take place, but that is a disruption at the moment that the FARC was going to liberate them. These spokesmen under the service of the international crime, who are precisely who support them, use these illogical and cynical affirmation without modesty or ruthlessness, above all, the respect to the human dignity. This outrageous mishandling of the deeds was to be expected, but what causes them to be ashamed and frustrated, is the answer to these affirmations, which are been spurned by the hostages themselves, now free, thanks to the president Uribe political decision and also from the Heroic Columbian Army.
As has been demonstrated by the military component and the police high professionalism and commitment, to checkmate these delinquents. Colombia does not need any international
cooperation from his neighboring countries in order to finish off this scourge, whereas by excepting the Peruvian Government, all others have obscure interests in allowing the FARC to have a moment of rest, and that these two countries (Colombia and Peru) fail to consolidate their democracies and their dynamical economic models, some are guided by a stingy egoism, others who want to impose their political project. The defeat, that these criminals have to undergone, must be military and it should not be a dialog or a negotiation; regarding this issue, it should be spurned the false and hypocritical cooperation which has the this purpose, whereas they pretend to get involved or intervene in the internal affair of these countries, ironically is the fact that most of the cases, they are unable to solve their own problems
